Hard flag
When. Pipe, lender comfort, a deeper buyer set on select-service
You give. Fees, PIP, and an exit clause that can be expensive
Hotels only · No pay-to-rank · Advice first; verified when attested
Job brief
How and who for the hotel job—verified when attested.
Usable on this screen
Affiliation is a contract. Model royalty, program fees, PIP, distribution, and the exit buyer. Do not add 80 basis points of cap rate because a logo is pretty.
Step 1
Remaining term, fees, territories, termination, liquidated damages. If you are independent, write the demand engine you actually have.
Step 2
Same rooms, different fee and PIP load, a honest guess at mix. Harbor’s estimate will not magically reprice a logo — you change the income lines.
Step 3
REIT, private, operator-buyer. Flags widen some rooms and close others. Independents need an operator story.
Step 4
If royalty and PIP are not in both models, it is not a decision. Harbor will not invent an affiliation premium.
Provider shortlist
Hotel labor design
Catalog score 8.2. A post-job shape, not a verification. Stable id brandt-vale.
Owner asset management
Catalog score 8.8. A post-job shape, not a verification. Stable id ashcroft.
Boutique acquisition underwriting
Catalog score 8.9. A post-job shape, not a verification. Stable id sable-desk.
Leave a record
Harbor by Signalry stays hotels only. A description, a claim, and a reported result each leave a stable id behind. Nothing here is a price, a customer, or a verification.
Buyer
No account. Harbor by Signalry opens the closest catalog brief, when not to buy, and a shortlist. A weak sentence stays on the catalog.
Open a briefSupplier
Company, jobs served, regions, and a hotel reference. The packet is queued as unverified pending. The form cannot mark it verified.
Start a claimHotel
A metric, before and after, and the dates. It is shown as reported until a person checks the evidence. Verified Outcome is not insurance.
Record a resultAdviceModel two files. A logo is not a decision.
VerifiedAlder House: 100% of FDD fee stack and entry PIP modeled; 24-month royalty ramp negotiated.
Situation
The table is arguing a logo. Nobody has written fees, PIP, or who buys the house next.
Approaches
When. Pipe, lender comfort, a deeper buyer set on select-service
You give. Fees, PIP, and an exit clause that can be expensive
When. Name and margin, if you can demand
You give. A thinner buyer set and a website problem
Who to involve
First 7 days
YAML-shaped: day / theme / tasks / owner / risk / exit. Advice until a case is verified.
day: 1
day: 2
day: 3
day: 4
day: 5
day: 6
day: 7
Decision worksheet
Take this to a vendor call. Budget bands are Advice — a Harbor shape, not a quote.
Ask the vendor
Red flags
When not to buy. Do not buy a logo debate without fees, PIP, mix, and who would buy the house next. Affiliation is cash flow, not a flag argument.
Do it in-house
Time and a named owner. No vendor. Use the 7-day plan first.
$12–40k to model and walk brand conversations
Typical Harbor band for this job — advice, not a quote.
Full program
People + system + 90-day proof. Only if the 7-day plan already failed.
Vendor checklist
Weighted questions — yes/no, scale, or text. Must-pass ids persist on this browser. Pass threshold 70. A no on a must-pass is a walk-away — not a maybe.
property context · weight 2 · must pass
Can they name your key count and whether you are independent, soft-brand, or major — without a discovery theater?
property context · weight 2 · must pass
Do they treat your PMS as a shape (Opera-class / Mews-class / Cloudbeds-class) — not a fake partnership slide?
control · weight 3 · must pass
Who types the status / number — a person, or your product?
vendor · weight 2
What would have happened anyway in 90 days without you?
vendor · weight 2
Show a property of this size and stack. Demo-labeled categories do not count as proof.
vendor · weight 2
What can your agent never do (folio post, mark clean, change a rate)?
vendor · weight 2
What is the kill-switch if guest comments move?
Does not clear
0 / 100
must_pass: brand-vs-independent-ctx-rooms, brand-vs-independent-ctx-stack, brand-vs-independent-q1
A must-pass failed. Walk away.
How
Affiliation is a contract. Model royalty, program fees, PIP, distribution, and the exit buyer. Do not add 80 basis points of cap rate because a logo is pretty.
Step 1
Remaining term, fees, territories, termination, liquidated damages. If you are independent, write the demand engine you actually have.
Step 2
Same rooms, different fee and PIP load, a honest guess at mix. Harbor’s estimate will not magically reprice a logo — you change the income lines.
Step 3
REIT, private, operator-buyer. Flags widen some rooms and close others. Independents need an operator story.
Step 4
If royalty and PIP are not in both models, it is not a decision. Harbor will not invent an affiliation premium.
Hard flag
You get. Pipe, lender comfort, a deeper buyer set on select-service
You give. Fees, PIP, and an exit clause that can be expensive
Stay independent
You get. Name and margin, if you can demand
You give. A thinner buyer set and a website problem
Pitfalls
Success criteria
Who
Rank is post-job score, then listed order. Not for sale. Software marked demo is an archetype.
Schedules, wage bands, and cross-training that keep the desk staffed without a 70-hour GM.
$11–20k labor redesign
Post-job
13 reviews
Independent owner advisors for GOP, management agreements, and capex sequencing — not a brand desk.
$25–60k engagement or $8k/month retainer
Post-job
22 reviews
Buy-side hotel underwriting for 40–200 key independents — ops reality, not just a trailing twelve.
$35–75k buy-side memo
Post-job
11 reviews
None ranked in Systems yet. Harbor will not invent a provider.
None ranked in AI agents yet. Harbor will not invent a provider.
Loading the compare table…
Compare
People do the work beside the desk. Software is a system — demo-labeled when it is a category shape. Agents draft; they do not post money or mark a room clean.
| Provider | Kind | Score | Fee | Pick when | Walk away when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandt & Vale Labor | People | 8.2 | $11–20k labor redesign | GMs living inside the schedule spreadsheet. | Hotels that only want bodies for this weekend. |
| Ashcroft Asset Advisors | People | 8.8 | $25–60k engagement or $8k/month retainer | Owners who want a second set of books that is not the manager's. | Branded flags looking for a PIP vendor. |
| Sable Underwriting Desk | People | 8.9 | $35–75k buy-side memo | First-time or small-fund buyers of a single boutique. | Institutional portfolios with an in-house desk. |
Open graph
This job is not pinned to a house yet. Open the graph to place it on a building, or the investment desk if the work is a sale file. Harbor will not invent a house.
Evidence
Compare up to three
Default sort is fit, high to low. Unpublished SLA / term / switch cost is labeled ask — not invented. Demo software is a shape.
Sort
3 of 3 compared. Highest fit is Sable Underwriting Desk at 8.8.
Highest fit
8.8