Contractor-led with hardware
When. A real 12–15% shot and a kill-switch
You give. Capital, or a shared-savings contract you must read
Hotels only · No pay-to-rank · Advice first; verified when attested
Job brief
How and who for the hotel job—verified when attested.
Usable on this screen
Meter, then sequence, then behave. A contractor who will kill a setpoint that produces comfort comments is worth more than a dashboard. Software can overlay complaints on kWh. An agent can suggest schedules. A human applies the setpoint. Shared-savings deals must be readable.
Step 1
If you cannot see laundry, kitchen, and guest floors apart, you will cut the wrong thing. A monitor without a contractor is still useful — it is not the job done.
Step 2
Controls, lighting, and heat recovery beat a poster in the linen room. Write the 'do nothing' case. Write the capex.
Step 3
Temperature comments are a kill-switch. If they rise, you roll back and you say so. That clause belongs in the contract.
Step 4
An agent can propose schedules against occupancy. The engineer or GM applies them. Auto-setpoint is how you freeze a fourth floor at 2 a.m.
Provider shortlist
Hotel energy without comfort hits
Catalog score 8.6. A post-job shape, not a verification. Stable id copperline.
Hotel energy monitoring
Catalog score 7.7. A post-job shape, not a verification. Stable id kilowatt-hall.
Setpoint & schedule suggestions
Catalog score 7.8. A post-job shape, not a verification. Stable id energy-loop.
Rooms vs public-space capex
Catalog score 8.3. A post-job shape, not a verification. Stable id vale-street.
Leave a record
Harbor by Signalry stays hotels only. A description, a claim, and a reported result each leave a stable id behind. Nothing here is a price, a customer, or a verification.
Buyer
No account. Harbor by Signalry opens the closest catalog brief, when not to buy, and a shortlist. A weak sentence stays on the catalog.
Open a briefSupplier
Company, jobs served, regions, and a hotel reference. The packet is queued as unverified pending. The form cannot mark it verified.
Start a claimHotel
A metric, before and after, and the dates. It is shown as reported until a person checks the evidence. Verified Outcome is not insurance.
Record a resultAdvicekWh without a comment watch is a comfort cut wearing a utility hat.
VerifiedCopper King: −16% weather-normalized kWh; temperature comments flat.
Situation
A setpoint agent wants the keys. Guests already mention the room was cold. Utilities are a line, not a walk.
Approaches
When. A real 12–15% shot and a kill-switch
You give. Capital, or a shared-savings contract you must read
When. Cheaper start, visibility
You give. A ceiling well below 15%
When. A prettier utility line this month
You give. Reviews, comps, and a GM who looks cheap
Who to involve
First 7 days
YAML-shaped: day / theme / tasks / owner / risk / exit. Advice until a case is verified.
day: 1
day: 2
day: 3
day: 4
day: 5
day: 6
day: 7
Decision worksheet
Take this to a vendor call. Budget bands are Advice — a Harbor shape, not a quote.
Ask the vendor
Red flags
When not to buy. A setpoint dump that treats guest comments as acceptable collateral. Comfort is a kill-switch, not a footnote.
Do it in-house
Time and a named owner. No vendor. Use the 7-day plan first.
$20–80k plus any hardware
Typical Harbor band for this job — advice, not a quote.
Full program
People + system + 90-day proof. Only if the 7-day plan already failed.
Vendor checklist
Weighted questions — yes/no, scale, or text. Must-pass ids persist on this browser. Pass threshold 70. A no on a must-pass is a walk-away — not a maybe.
property context · weight 2 · must pass
Can they name your key count and whether you are independent, soft-brand, or major — without a discovery theater?
property context · weight 2 · must pass
Do they treat your PMS as a shape (Opera-class / Mews-class / Cloudbeds-class) — not a fake partnership slide?
control · weight 3 · must pass
Who types the status / number — a person, or your product?
vendor · weight 2
What would have happened anyway in 90 days without you?
vendor · weight 2
Show a property of this size and stack. Demo-labeled categories do not count as proof.
vendor · weight 2
What can your agent never do (folio post, mark clean, change a rate)?
vendor · weight 2
What is the kill-switch if guest comments move?
Does not clear
0 / 100
must_pass: cut-energy-without-comfort-hits-ctx-rooms, cut-energy-without-comfort-hits-ctx-stack, cut-energy-without-comfort-hits-q1
A must-pass failed. Walk away.
How
Meter, then sequence, then behave. A contractor who will kill a setpoint that produces comfort comments is worth more than a dashboard. Software can overlay complaints on kWh. An agent can suggest schedules. A human applies the setpoint. Shared-savings deals must be readable.
Step 1
If you cannot see laundry, kitchen, and guest floors apart, you will cut the wrong thing. A monitor without a contractor is still useful — it is not the job done.
Step 2
Controls, lighting, and heat recovery beat a poster in the linen room. Write the 'do nothing' case. Write the capex.
Step 3
Temperature comments are a kill-switch. If they rise, you roll back and you say so. That clause belongs in the contract.
Step 4
An agent can propose schedules against occupancy. The engineer or GM applies them. Auto-setpoint is how you freeze a fourth floor at 2 a.m.
Contractor-led with hardware
You get. A real 12–15% shot and a kill-switch
You give. Capital, or a shared-savings contract you must read
Monitor plus behavior
You get. Cheaper start, visibility
You give. A ceiling well below 15%
Aggressive setpoints
You get. A prettier utility line this month
You give. Reviews, comps, and a GM who looks cheap
Pitfalls
Success criteria
Who
Rank is post-job score, then listed order. Not for sale. Software marked demo is an archetype.
Energy programs that treat guest comfort as a constraint, not a slide in the savings deck.
$22–50k audit + shared-savings option
Post-job
17 reviews
FF&E and renovation sequencing that starts from guest-job evidence, not a lobby mood board.
$20–45k study; implementation bid separate
Post-job
14 reviews
Demo-labeled energy dashboard by floor and daypart, built to sit next to a comfort complaint feed.
Demo · $1.50–3.00 / room / month + hardware
Post-job
8 reviews
Suggests HVAC schedules against occupancy and comfort comments. A human applies the setpoint.
$199–499 / month
Post-job
6 reviews
Loading the compare table…
Compare
People do the work beside the desk. Software is a system — demo-labeled when it is a category shape. Agents draft; they do not post money or mark a room clean.
| Provider | Kind | Score | Fee | Pick when | Walk away when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copperline Energy | People | 8.6 | $22–50k audit + shared-savings option | Older hotels with a real utility line and a GM who will not freeze guests. | New-build flags with an energy team already in-house. |
| Vale Street Capex | People | 8.3 | $20–45k study; implementation bid separate | Owners choosing between a pretty lobby and rooms that book. | Full PIP execution for a 400-key flag. |
| Kilowatt Hall | Software· demo | 7.7 | Demo · $1.50–3.00 / room / month + hardware | GMs who want energy and comfort on one page. | Hotels that need a turnkey ESCO, not a monitor. |
| Energy Loop Agent | Agent | 7.8 | $199–499 / month | Hotels that already have a contractor and want a daily loop. | A first energy project with no hardware. |
Open graph
Evidence
Compare up to three
Default sort is fit, high to low. Unpublished SLA / term / switch cost is labeled ask — not invented. Demo software is a shape.
Sort
3 of 3 compared. Highest fit is Copperline Energy at 8.4.
Highest fit
8.4