Skip to content
Harborby Signalry
VL
People

Who, after the job

Vault Lane

How and who for the hotel job—verified when attested.

Card tokenization & PCI scopeCuts card-present and virtual-card flows down to a token path a QSA can follow.
8.6

Post-job

11 reviews

Not certifiedA catalog listing is not evidence. Harbor by Signalry has not checked this provider. Evidence tiers

Leave a record

The next hotel starts from what you leave

Harbor by Signalry stays hotels only. A description, a claim, and a reported result each leave a stable id behind. Nothing here is a price, a customer, or a verification.

  • Buyer

    Describe your job

    No account. Harbor by Signalry opens the closest catalog brief, when not to buy, and a shortlist. A weak sentence stays on the catalog.

    Open a brief
  • Supplier

    Claim this listing

    Company, jobs served, regions, and a hotel reference. The packet is queued as unverified pending. The form cannot mark it verified.

    Claim this listing
  • Hotel

    Record a result

    A metric, before and after, and the dates. It is shown as reported until a person checks the evidence. Verified Outcome is not insurance.

    Record a result

HQ

Chicago, IL

Coverage

US, 80–400 rooms

Typical fee

$22–40k scoped engagement

PMS shape (demo)

opera, mews

Keys

80-200, 200-plus

Flag

independent, branded

About

Vault Lane is two former hotel controllers and a QSA partner. They map every place a PAN still appears — folio, email, shared drive, night-audit print — then implement a token path. They will not sell you a new PMS to fix a process problem.

AdviceOwners who are tired of PANs living in inboxes.

ClaimedThree properties reduced SAQ scope from D to A-EP after tokenizing group deposits.

Best for

Owners who are tired of PANs living in inboxes.

Not for

Hotels looking for a cheaper processor as the primary goal.

Score breakdown

Outcome · 50%

8.5

Integrity · 30%

9.0

Fit · 20%

8.3

Trust & methodology — post-job, no paid rank.

Evidence

  • · Three properties reduced SAQ scope from D to A-EP after tokenizing group deposits.
  • · Delivers a diagram the next IT lead can inherit.

Tradeoffs they name

  • · They will not implement a gateway they have not seen fail.
  • · Expects owner sign-off on residual risk.

Jobs they appear on

Peer cases